1. Show or hide comments about the document.

  2. Search over the document's text.

  3. Share the document through social networks or e-mail.

  4. After selecting an area on the page.

  5. ...you can:
    copy the text
    share the segment
    comment
    cite the document

Spring 2024
ISSN 0890-913X
Volume 39, Number 1

Why Is There No Milton Friedman Today?

William J. Luther, Florida Atlantic Univeristy
Download Share e-mail
  • << Back to editing
  • Previous version by
  • << Older
  • Newer >>
  • Revert to this one
  • Edit
  • Fullscreen
  • Show comments
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Zoom:
     
     
  • Page:  / 9
  •  
  •  
  •  
  • Line spacing:
     
     
  • Word spacing:
     
     
  • Search:FindClose
 
search results
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
612
792
1
0
/index.php?action=ajax&rs=GDMgetPage&rsargs[]=Parte1 2024 Journal of Private Enterprise Vol 39 No 1 Spring.pdf&rsargs[]=0
WilliamJ.Luther.WhyIsThereNoMiltonFriedmanToday?”TheJournalofPrivateEnterprise39(1),2024,1-9.WhyIsThereNoMiltonFriedmanToday?*WilliamJ.LutherFloridaAtlanticUniversityUnitedStatesofAmericaAbstractThereisnoMiltonFriedmantoday.ThereisunlikelytobeanotherMiltonFriedmantomorrow.AndthatisOK.Indeed,itisaproductoftheprogressFriedmanandothershavemadetoadvancethecauseoflimitedgovernmentandfreeexchange.JELCodes:A20,B20,B31,P16Keywords:MiltonFriedman,historyofeconomicthought,freemarketeconomics,economiceducationAlittleoveradecadeago,theMercatusCenteratGeorgeMasonUniversityorganizedasymposiumcenteredonthefollowingquestion:whyistherenoMiltonFriedmantoday?Thesymposiumfeaturedcontributionsfromarangeofscholars,includingJohnBlundell(2013),DavidColander(2013),TylerCowen(2013),RichardEpstein(2013),JamesK.Galbraith(2013),J.DanielHammond(2013),DavidR.Henderson(2013),DanielHouser(2013),StevenMedema(2013),SamPeltzman(2013),RichardPosner(2013),andRobertSolow(2013).ThequestionresurfacedinDecember2023,followingthedeathofRobertSolow.1ButIsuspectitseemedworthaskingagainforotherreasons,aswell.ThepastsixyearshavebeenmarkedbypoorpoliciesintheUnitedStatespoliciesFriedmanalmostcertainlywouldhave*Presidentialaddresspreparedforthe2024AssociationofPrivateEnterpriseEducationannualmeeting.1Solow(2013,p.215)tookanespeciallynegativeviewofFriedman:ImgladthereisnoMiltonFriedmananywhereonthepolitical-economyspectrumtoday.IthinkthatMiltonFriedmansarebadforeconomicsandbadforsociety.Fruitlessdebateswithtalented(near-)extremistswastealotofeveryonestimethatcouldhavebeenspentmoreconstructively,eitherinresearchorinarguingaboutpolicyissuesinamorepragmaticway.Isupposethatsuchdebatesalsohelptoclarifyimplicitassumptionsandshadyarguments,butIthinkthatisasmallbenefitcomparedwiththecostinsheerhassle.”
GLIFOS-digital_archive